I would say that for me comquest seemed more representative and looked like the exam when it came to layout. The answer to truelearn vs comquest is likely use one + uworld. I used comquest during my dedicated and combank throughout the school year for comats.
Uworld with comquest (supplement for. Uworld is still by far the best qbank, even for level 3. Depending on your specialty, i’d try to get more questions in on.
But until both banks also. Comlex level 3 is different. They also had better explanations than comabnk. I didn’t get through nearly half of combank just because of scheduling, but getting those practice cases and omm was helpful.
Comat scores were only 30%. In my opinion, combank will prepare you a lot better for level 3, especially if you are looking to get a 650+. Hi, i'm beginning a late dedicated and was wondering which one was better. You need to decide which bank helps you learn the best and the.
Uworld prepares you well for step 3, but definitely not level 3. Uworld feels exactly like step, so if you want to do better on step material i'd do that. You should also do another comlex. I used the kaplan step 3 book for reference (it had the best reviews online).
For comlex, combank feels closer to comlex but it's not great. I used combank and got through about 1300 questions. Our school gives us combank, which seems ok at best but was wondering what those who have experienced comquest in comparison to combank think. It is great to do well on the exam, and it helps prepare you for comlex level two, but the main part of your grade is usually from your preceptors.
Combank questions are simply not of good quality and they're failing to adapt to the evolving comlex/comat style of questions. Annotate well, as much of the testable material is best represented in uworld.